David Katz, M.D.
Director, Yale Prevention Research Center
Posted: 04/25/11 08:39 AM ET

Surprise, somewhat surprisingly, has emerged as a theme in my recent work. A little over a week ago, I was in the beautiful Alpine town of Gmunden, in Upper Austria, participating in a ‘surprise factors’ symposium. The provincial government of Upper Austria convened a think tank of experts to help them anticipate and prepare for upcoming, societal surprises, in pursuit of the best possible health, and social vitality, for their population of 1.6 million people.

Yesterday, I participated in a childhood obesity conference at the Cleveland Clinic, convened jointly by the Clinic, and Slate Magazine. I was privileged to share the podium with, among others, Dr. Toby Cosgrove, Cleveland Clinic CEO; the CEO (or ‘Tea-E-O’ as he prefers) of Honest Tea™, Seth Goldman; Dr. Ezekiel Emanuel, until recently a health policy advisor at the White House; the mayor of Oklahoma City; and Melody Barnes, the architect of the First Lady’s Let’s Move program.

Following my comments, and those of others, I was interviewed by a reporter with the Cleveland Plain Dealer who asked me to note any surprises the conference had revealed.

The first part of my answer was … none, really. After all, when you are asked to speak on a topic in which you ostensibly have expertise, you really aren’t supposed to be surprised. An entry level criterion for being an ‘expert’ is knowing the important things going on in one’s field. By and large, if you are surprised in a discussion of your own field, it means you haven’t been doing your homework!

So my colleagues’ comments did not surprise me, any more than mine surprised them (although they may have been surprised that I made mine in rhyme). We all agreed on the urgent peril of epidemic childhood and adult obesity; we agreed on its multifactorial origins in modern social and environmental changes; and we agreed on the need for an aggregation of solutions in every setting to get us all to the prize of better health and vitality.

But then I thought about the juxtaposition between what was going on in that auditorium, and outside of it — and did have a surprise to share.

I am surprised, and even more so concerned, about how readily people with good common sense switch it off when it comes to weight control and the illusory promise of a quick fix. While experts in an auditorium were discussing menu boards, sidewalks, school food, worksite wellness, and the Farm Bill — people in the real world were lining up for the Dukan Diet, the HCG Diet, or perhaps the imminent ‘fructose free’ diet.

Each of these is at present something of a phenomenon, and through the filter of either expertise or common sense, none deserves to be!

The Dukan Diet is a best-selling global phenomenon because it has helped several women in the royal wedding party- including bride-to-be Kate Middleton — slim down for the nuptials. But the diet is tried-and-failed low-carb nonsense, just with a French accent this time. Of course you lose weight when you cut out all carbs, and consequently cut down enormously on calories. You could just as well lose weight eating ONLY carbs, as the infamous Twinkie Diet showed us.

The Dukan Diet is not healthful, and not sustainable. It offers nothing new — just a new label. The princess, alas, is destined to gain back any weight she lost with this quick-fix approach. It is surprising how perennially, even among intelligent and highly educated people, weight loss hope triumphs over experience.

The Dukan Diet is merely bad; the HCG Diet is potentially deadly. This diet, too, is wildly popular — which is not just surprising, but shocking. The HCG Diet combines hormone injections which all published studies show to be useless for weight loss, with extreme calorie restriction that studies show can be lethal. I have been contacted by a forensic pathologist investigating the sudden death of a formerly healthy, 34-year-old mother of two. She was three weeks into the HCG Diet, and from all I’ve heard so far, that was the only smoking gun on the scene.

Then, there was the recent combination of a YouTube video by Dr. Robert Lustig, and a New York Times Magazine article by Gary Taubes, suggesting that sugar in general — and fructose in particular — is poison. The popularity of this concept is an open invitation to food manufacturers to start inundating us with ‘fructose free’ junk food. Fructose-free soda is already here, with labeling implying a virtue the product assuredly lacks!

So, the divide between our common sense and our common behaviors is … surprising.

At the conference in Cleveland, we acknowledged how challenging it is to change some of what stands between our families, and better health — such as a Farm Bill that favors the interest of ‘big food’ over you and me. But in response, I noted that we moms and dads in our multitudes have the potential to be the greatest, most unstoppable “special interest group” of all time. Our special interest is the health of our children!

So I hold out hope that our common sense will lead us to common cause. That we will reject false promises and quick fixes, and rally around the policies, practices, and programs that will situate weight control and health on a path of lesser resistance for us all. Perhaps that’s the triumph of my own hope over experience, but what a happy surprise it would be!

Dr. David L. Katz; http://www.davidkatzmd.com


  1. FunOdd.com says:

    The 6 Greatest Ginger Athletes Of All-Time…

    TCU’s star quarterback and top NFL draft prospect Andy Dalton has been making news for reasons other than his 166 passer rating last season. Sport Illustrated recently reported that at least one NFL team is worried about the graduating Horned Frog’s …

  2. jMON says:

    I really like the idea of her method as a goal, but find this to be something for people already in very good shape. Just as she is known for her famous clients, who were already in great shape: Gwyneth P., Madonna, Courtney Cox, Shakira, Giselle B., etc. I worry that young women and girls will buy into this and create unhealthy expectations for themselves. What is in the book is already out there in interviews about her, so there was nothing new here but I understand it is for anyone new to TA.

    My criticism is that her method isn’t sustainable. Anyone who exercises 1.5 hours a day will be getting a great workout regardless, but what about the diet? After the 30 days her diet menu suggestions are nearly identical to the kick start. If you asked a nutritionist if it would be safe to continue a diet like this the answer would be no. After the kick start there are also no carbs, except fruit; forget ever having a piece of whole wheat bread or any other grains. If your an actress or model, I get it. However for regular people who go to work everyday, you need some carbs to be able to think. The no carbs path has proven futile; low carb is doable. How she backs up her nutrition advice would be interesting, but she doesn’t write about it here. Her expertise is in her 10 years of research. That is the extent of her qualification.

    Also, it sounds very alluring to tell people that after 30 days of a stringent diet & exercise program your body will allow you to eat what you want because you have recalibrated your system, except it’s just not true and impossible. It may be true for someone like Gwyneth P. or Courtney C., both actresses have always been skinny girls. And it contradicts her diet regime, for the kick start and afterward, which is very strict.

    It is a great concept and I get it. I was really drawn to TA & her method because it sounded different and was specific, but this book really showed me how she is selling an idea that is not remotely possible for everyone. How can someone really sustain this after a month or two of 1.5 hrs. of exercise and a limited diet? Again, the diet after the bootcamp is nearly the same as the bootcamp. The bootcamp diet in the book is very limited and very time consuming. She gives an excuse as to why she doesn’t give choices because somehow we will be overwhelmed and she doesn’t want us to think about it until after the 30 days, so you have to follow exactly what she has designed. She says so herself. Her chef prepared the meals from the recipes. Really? She couldn’t do it herself, to show how this can easily fit into one’s everyday life? How many of us have a chef to cook our meals? I could go on…I sold the book on Amazon, but hope it won’t produce any psychological damage to a young girl’s mind and or health, who might think this is the answer. It’s an extreme program. I have no doubt people will get results, but at what cost?

    Update: If this review offends you, I apologize. TA’s fans are very passionate as comments made here have shown. I am not discrediting her exercise philosophy or TA herself. This program – 30 day kick start/bootcamp – is just not for everyone ok?…relax haters. I would say the diet in Jackie Warner’s book is healthier & reasonable. Maybe do TA’s exercises with a healthier diet? A diet that you can continue for the rest of your life.

  3. I have suffered extreme panic attacks for a few years and could not get to the bottom of it. A friend who had used the Linden Method recommended it to me and from the first page my life began to change! Im not saying I was cured straight away but over a couple of weeks the change was fabulous! I’m still recovering and somedays I see a glimpse of anxiety but I’m panic free and my life and my families life are much happier now. It has helped me a great deal Click Here

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s